[Back to Issue 3 ToC] [Back to Journal Contents] [Back to Biochemistry (Moscow) Home page]

“False” Thymine-1H-Enol Guanine Base Pair. Low Misinsertion Rate by DNA Polymerase Explained by Computational Chemistry Consideration


E. Seclaman1,2, L. Kurunczi1,2, and Z. Simon2*

1University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Victor Babes” Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; fax: 40256-220-479; E-mail: eddie@acad-icht.tm.edu.ro; dick@acad-icht.tm.edu.ro

2Romanian Academy, Institute of Chemistry Timisoara, Mihai Viteazul 24, 300223 Timisoara, Romania; fax: 40256-491-824; E-mail: zsimon@acad-icht.tm.edu.ro

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Received September 18, 2006; Revision received November 2, 2006
Formation of correct TA and GC and “false” thymine-1H-enol guanine (TGenol) base pairs is here considered to control nucleotide insertion into DNA via low substrate concentration Michaelis-Menten controlled kinetics. Contributions of base pairing to formation of Gibbs free energies in water solution, DeltaDeltaG, are calculated for the correct and false base pairs with the semi-empiric MNDO/PM3 method for base pairing energies in vacuum and the BEM method for hydration effects. The results for DeltaDeltaG indicate equal insertion rates for correct base pairing and a 10-3-10-4 error probability for false insertion controlled by the TGenol false pair.
KEY WORDS: point mutation rates, misinsertion rates, enzymatic Michaelis-Menten kinetics, molecular energy in aqueous solution calculation, PM3

DOI: 10.1134/S000629790703011X